Environmental assessment of different harvesting solutions for Short Rotation Coppice plantations.
Identifieur interne : 001893 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001892; suivant : 001894Environmental assessment of different harvesting solutions for Short Rotation Coppice plantations.
Auteurs : Jacopo Bacenetti [Italie] ; Domenico Pessina [Italie] ; Marco Fiala [Italie]Source :
- The Science of the total environment [ 1879-1026 ] ; 2016.
Abstract
Although several studies have been carried out on Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) plantations and on their environmental performances, there is a lack of information about the environmental impact of the harvesting operations. In this study, using LCA approach, the environmental performance of two different harvesting solutions for Short Rotation Coppice plantations was evaluated. In more details, for 2-years cutting time poplar plantations, harvesting with a self-propelled forager equipped with a specific header was compared in terms of environmental impact with a tractor-based solution. The LCI was built with experimental data collected during field tests carried out over about 70 ha of SRC plantation in Northern Italy. The following nine impact potentials were evaluated according to the selected method: climate change (CC), ozone depletion (OD), particulate matter (PM), photochemical ozone formation (POF), acidification (TA), freshwater eutrophication (FE), terrestrial eutrophication (TE), marine eutrophication (ME) and mineral, fossil and renewable resource depletion (MFRD). Although harvesting with self-propelled foragers requires higher power and higher diesel consumption, it achieves better environmental performances respect to the harvest with the tractor-based solution. The tractor-based option is characterized by lower operative field capacity (about - 70% for all the evaluated impact categories except for MFRD, which is - 94% compared to the first option). The environmental differences are mainly related to the different machine productivity. From an environmental point of view, respect to the harvesting with self-propelled foragers, the tractor-based solution can achieve a lower environmental impact only in small SRC plantations (<1-2 ha).
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.095
PubMed: 26410696
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Environmental assessment of different harvesting solutions for Short Rotation Coppice plantations.</title><author><name sortKey="Bacenetti, Jacopo" sort="Bacenetti, Jacopo" uniqKey="Bacenetti J" first="Jacopo" last="Bacenetti">Jacopo Bacenetti</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy. Electronic address: jacopo.bacenetti@unimi.it.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>20133 Milano</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pessina, Domenico" sort="Pessina, Domenico" uniqKey="Pessina D" first="Domenico" last="Pessina">Domenico Pessina</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>20133 Milano</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fiala, Marco" sort="Fiala, Marco" uniqKey="Fiala M" first="Marco" last="Fiala">Marco Fiala</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>20133 Milano</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:26410696</idno><idno type="pmid">26410696</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.095</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001A92</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001A92</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001A92</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">001A92</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001A92</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Environmental assessment of different harvesting solutions for Short Rotation Coppice plantations.</title><author><name sortKey="Bacenetti, Jacopo" sort="Bacenetti, Jacopo" uniqKey="Bacenetti J" first="Jacopo" last="Bacenetti">Jacopo Bacenetti</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy. Electronic address: jacopo.bacenetti@unimi.it.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>20133 Milano</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pessina, Domenico" sort="Pessina, Domenico" uniqKey="Pessina D" first="Domenico" last="Pessina">Domenico Pessina</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>20133 Milano</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fiala, Marco" sort="Fiala, Marco" uniqKey="Fiala M" first="Marco" last="Fiala">Marco Fiala</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>20133 Milano</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Science of the total environment</title><idno type="eISSN">1879-1026</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Although several studies have been carried out on Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) plantations and on their environmental performances, there is a lack of information about the environmental impact of the harvesting operations. In this study, using LCA approach, the environmental performance of two different harvesting solutions for Short Rotation Coppice plantations was evaluated. In more details, for 2-years cutting time poplar plantations, harvesting with a self-propelled forager equipped with a specific header was compared in terms of environmental impact with a tractor-based solution. The LCI was built with experimental data collected during field tests carried out over about 70 ha of SRC plantation in Northern Italy. The following nine impact potentials were evaluated according to the selected method: climate change (CC), ozone depletion (OD), particulate matter (PM), photochemical ozone formation (POF), acidification (TA), freshwater eutrophication (FE), terrestrial eutrophication (TE), marine eutrophication (ME) and mineral, fossil and renewable resource depletion (MFRD). Although harvesting with self-propelled foragers requires higher power and higher diesel consumption, it achieves better environmental performances respect to the harvest with the tractor-based solution. The tractor-based option is characterized by lower operative field capacity (about - 70% for all the evaluated impact categories except for MFRD, which is - 94% compared to the first option). The environmental differences are mainly related to the different machine productivity. From an environmental point of view, respect to the harvesting with self-propelled foragers, the tractor-based solution can achieve a lower environmental impact only in small SRC plantations (<1-2 ha).</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">26410696</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2016</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>20</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>08</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1879-1026</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>541</Volume><PubDate><Year>2016</Year><Month>Jan</Month><Day>15</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Science of the total environment</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Sci Total Environ</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Environmental assessment of different harvesting solutions for Short Rotation Coppice plantations.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>210-217</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0048-9697(15)30755-5</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.095</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Although several studies have been carried out on Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) plantations and on their environmental performances, there is a lack of information about the environmental impact of the harvesting operations. In this study, using LCA approach, the environmental performance of two different harvesting solutions for Short Rotation Coppice plantations was evaluated. In more details, for 2-years cutting time poplar plantations, harvesting with a self-propelled forager equipped with a specific header was compared in terms of environmental impact with a tractor-based solution. The LCI was built with experimental data collected during field tests carried out over about 70 ha of SRC plantation in Northern Italy. The following nine impact potentials were evaluated according to the selected method: climate change (CC), ozone depletion (OD), particulate matter (PM), photochemical ozone formation (POF), acidification (TA), freshwater eutrophication (FE), terrestrial eutrophication (TE), marine eutrophication (ME) and mineral, fossil and renewable resource depletion (MFRD). Although harvesting with self-propelled foragers requires higher power and higher diesel consumption, it achieves better environmental performances respect to the harvest with the tractor-based solution. The tractor-based option is characterized by lower operative field capacity (about - 70% for all the evaluated impact categories except for MFRD, which is - 94% compared to the first option). The environmental differences are mainly related to the different machine productivity. From an environmental point of view, respect to the harvesting with self-propelled foragers, the tractor-based solution can achieve a lower environmental impact only in small SRC plantations (<1-2 ha).</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bacenetti</LastName><ForeName>Jacopo</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy. Electronic address: jacopo.bacenetti@unimi.it.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pessina</LastName><ForeName>Domenico</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Fiala</LastName><ForeName>Marco</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Giovanni Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2015</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>25</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country><MedlineTA>Sci Total Environ</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0330500</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0048-9697</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Mechanization</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Northern Italy</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Poplar</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Short rotation forestry</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Woody biomass</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2015</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>02</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2015</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>16</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2015</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>17</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2015</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2015</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26410696</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0048-9697(15)30755-5</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.095</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Italie</li></country></list><tree><country name="Italie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Bacenetti, Jacopo" sort="Bacenetti, Jacopo" uniqKey="Bacenetti J" first="Jacopo" last="Bacenetti">Jacopo Bacenetti</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Fiala, Marco" sort="Fiala, Marco" uniqKey="Fiala M" first="Marco" last="Fiala">Marco Fiala</name><name sortKey="Pessina, Domenico" sort="Pessina, Domenico" uniqKey="Pessina D" first="Domenico" last="Pessina">Domenico Pessina</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001893 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001893 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:26410696
|texte= Environmental assessment of different harvesting solutions for Short Rotation Coppice plantations.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26410696" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |